<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Nickell's Bag</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nickellbag.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nickellbag.com</link>
	<description>Music, art, and life in Missoula</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 18:54:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Should we really hate the Mount St. Helens Vietnam Band? by Aaron Poehler</title>
		<link>http://nickellbag.com/2012/02/17/should-we-really-hate-the-mount-st-helens-vietnam-band/comment-page-1/#comment-13287</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Poehler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 18:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nickellbag.com/?p=2051#comment-13287</guid>
		<description>Reminds me of OK Go, whose videos have garnered them a certain name recognition but whose music is totally unmemorable. 

I think (for me, anyway) the dividing issue is whether the publicity stunt/angle/gimmick outweighs the perceived quality of the band&#039;s music, not whether their music is derivative--that seems beside the point. Everything is derivative, of course, but if the music itself doesn&#039;t seem to merit the attention they attempt to bring for themselves then people begin to resent blatant self-promotion--the thinking being somewhat along the lines of &quot;If you&#039;re going to go to (x) lengths to get me to pay attention to you, it&#039;s only justified if the music is (y) good.&quot;  And if the the music is judged to be &lt;y quality, one feels they have been &quot;tricked&quot; into listening somehow, which results in a backlash expressed through negative reviews, the writing of which is further justified by the existence of other negative reviews, the arguments of which then get agglomerated into other (derivative) reviews, and the snowball continues until the journalistic shorthand boils down to &quot;Oh yeah, that derivative band with the infomercial gimmick. I hear they&#039;re derivative.&quot; The internet loves a good dogpile, after all.

A good argument for bands to concentrate more on making music and less on publicity, one might justifiably argue -- but then again they are touring, in itself at least partially promotional.

I personally have never heard this band and don&#039;t plan to search their music out so I don&#039;t have an opinion on their music one way of the other. Their terrible name alone would be enough to put me off unless they came highly recommended from a trusted source, which based on your article seems highly unlikely to happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reminds me of OK Go, whose videos have garnered them a certain name recognition but whose music is totally unmemorable. </p>
<p>I think (for me, anyway) the dividing issue is whether the publicity stunt/angle/gimmick outweighs the perceived quality of the band&#8217;s music, not whether their music is derivative&#8211;that seems beside the point. Everything is derivative, of course, but if the music itself doesn&#8217;t seem to merit the attention they attempt to bring for themselves then people begin to resent blatant self-promotion&#8211;the thinking being somewhat along the lines of &#8220;If you&#8217;re going to go to (x) lengths to get me to pay attention to you, it&#8217;s only justified if the music is (y) good.&#8221;  And if the the music is judged to be &lt;y quality, one feels they have been &quot;tricked&quot; into listening somehow, which results in a backlash expressed through negative reviews, the writing of which is further justified by the existence of other negative reviews, the arguments of which then get agglomerated into other (derivative) reviews, and the snowball continues until the journalistic shorthand boils down to &quot;Oh yeah, that derivative band with the infomercial gimmick. I hear they&#039;re derivative.&quot; The internet loves a good dogpile, after all.</p>
<p>A good argument for bands to concentrate more on making music and less on publicity, one might justifiably argue &#8212; but then again they are touring, in itself at least partially promotional.</p>
<p>I personally have never heard this band and don&#039;t plan to search their music out so I don&#039;t have an opinion on their music one way of the other. Their terrible name alone would be enough to put me off unless they came highly recommended from a trusted source, which based on your article seems highly unlikely to happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Yours truly among Humanities Montana grant recipients by Janene Murphy</title>
		<link>http://nickellbag.com/2012/02/14/yours-truly-among-humanities-montana-grant-recipients/comment-page-1/#comment-13283</link>
		<dc:creator>Janene Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 20:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nickellbag.com/?p=2048#comment-13283</guid>
		<description>Congratulations, Joe. That&#039;s fantastic! Well-deserved, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations, Joe. That&#8217;s fantastic! Well-deserved, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sax appeal: an encore by Lloyd Anderson</title>
		<link>http://nickellbag.com/2012/01/19/sax-appeal-an-encore/comment-page-1/#comment-13173</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 17:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nickellbag.com/?p=2041#comment-13173</guid>
		<description>I was really appalled by Joe Nickell&#039;s articles attacking saxophones.  One would expect an A&amp;E writer in a college town to possess opinions which are at least informed, and even, hopefully, halfway hip.  Anyone who by biased generalization can dismiss Sonny Rollins, David Murray and Joe Lovano is neither of the above.

Compounding the situation is the fact that Missoula is home base to a  saxophonist who ranks  with those three in technical virtuosity and improvisational genius, that being Chuck Florence.  Please open your ears Mr. Nickell. It will do you good.

Lloyd Anderson</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was really appalled by Joe Nickell&#8217;s articles attacking saxophones.  One would expect an A&amp;E writer in a college town to possess opinions which are at least informed, and even, hopefully, halfway hip.  Anyone who by biased generalization can dismiss Sonny Rollins, David Murray and Joe Lovano is neither of the above.</p>
<p>Compounding the situation is the fact that Missoula is home base to a  saxophonist who ranks  with those three in technical virtuosity and improvisational genius, that being Chuck Florence.  Please open your ears Mr. Nickell. It will do you good.</p>
<p>Lloyd Anderson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sax appeal: an encore by Henry Bones</title>
		<link>http://nickellbag.com/2012/01/19/sax-appeal-an-encore/comment-page-1/#comment-13162</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry Bones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 18:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nickellbag.com/?p=2041#comment-13162</guid>
		<description>Mr. Joe Nickell, 
&quot;In my work, it&#039;s important that I try to comprehend what people value in different types of music, and to help guide the right audience to the right music when I can.&quot;  Agreed!  In your work, it is important that you try to comprehend.  
&quot;....when talking with people about music, I often hear the refrain, &quot;I like all kinds of music.&quot; Here&#039;s a bold assertion based on little beyond my own bias:  I tend to think that people who say that don&#039;t really care deeply about any music.&quot;
Is this what you call comprehending, Mr. Nickell?    Feels pompous and dogmatic to me.
I like all kinds of literature, and care deeply about the books I&#039;ve read.  I like reading all kinds of critical reviews of the arts, but can&#039;t recall ever reading a review where the critic presses the issue of his dislike of any one instrument I don&#039;t care much for the sound of a banjo, but, boy does it ever mix well with the music like Allison Krauss puts out. (By the way, if you ever get the chance, spend a quiet moment or two with Ben Webster).   
Do your work, Mr. Nickell; seek to understand and comprehend the whole of the music experience to share with your readership.    My guess is that at most, 10 people out of 40,000 readers or .000002% joined in singing the blues with you about your saxophone drivel.  
I leave you with a Raymond Carver poem:

Music
Franz Liszt eloped with Countess Marie d’ Agoult,
who wrote novels.  Polite society washed its hands
of him, and his novelist-countess whore.
Liszt gave her three children, and music.
Then went off with Princess Wittgenstein.
Cosima, Liszt’s daughter, married
the conductor, Hans von Bulow.
But Richard Wagner stole her.  Took her away
to Bayreuth.  Where Liszt show up one morning.
Long white hair flouncing.
Shaking his fist.  Music.  Music!
Everybody grew more famous.

HenryBones</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Joe Nickell,<br />
&#8220;In my work, it&#8217;s important that I try to comprehend what people value in different types of music, and to help guide the right audience to the right music when I can.&#8221;  Agreed!  In your work, it is important that you try to comprehend.<br />
&#8220;&#8230;.when talking with people about music, I often hear the refrain, &#8220;I like all kinds of music.&#8221; Here&#8217;s a bold assertion based on little beyond my own bias:  I tend to think that people who say that don&#8217;t really care deeply about any music.&#8221;<br />
Is this what you call comprehending, Mr. Nickell?    Feels pompous and dogmatic to me.<br />
I like all kinds of literature, and care deeply about the books I&#8217;ve read.  I like reading all kinds of critical reviews of the arts, but can&#8217;t recall ever reading a review where the critic presses the issue of his dislike of any one instrument I don&#8217;t care much for the sound of a banjo, but, boy does it ever mix well with the music like Allison Krauss puts out. (By the way, if you ever get the chance, spend a quiet moment or two with Ben Webster).<br />
Do your work, Mr. Nickell; seek to understand and comprehend the whole of the music experience to share with your readership.    My guess is that at most, 10 people out of 40,000 readers or .000002% joined in singing the blues with you about your saxophone drivel.<br />
I leave you with a Raymond Carver poem:</p>
<p>Music<br />
Franz Liszt eloped with Countess Marie d’ Agoult,<br />
who wrote novels.  Polite society washed its hands<br />
of him, and his novelist-countess whore.<br />
Liszt gave her three children, and music.<br />
Then went off with Princess Wittgenstein.<br />
Cosima, Liszt’s daughter, married<br />
the conductor, Hans von Bulow.<br />
But Richard Wagner stole her.  Took her away<br />
to Bayreuth.  Where Liszt show up one morning.<br />
Long white hair flouncing.<br />
Shaking his fist.  Music.  Music!<br />
Everybody grew more famous.</p>
<p>HenryBones</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on I might consider sax with Verdi by Sax appeal: an encore &#171; Nickell&#8217;s Bag</title>
		<link>http://nickellbag.com/2012/01/14/i-might-consider-sax-with-verdi/comment-page-1/#comment-13146</link>
		<dc:creator>Sax appeal: an encore &#171; Nickell&#8217;s Bag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 19:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nickellbag.com/?p=2020#comment-13146</guid>
		<description>[...] I might consider sax with Verdi [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I might consider sax with Verdi [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The strange sounds of Satan by Joe Nickell</title>
		<link>http://nickellbag.com/2012/01/18/2038/comment-page-1/#comment-13145</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Nickell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 19:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nickellbag.com/?p=2038#comment-13145</guid>
		<description>TRASH?!? This stuff is pure gold!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TRASH?!? This stuff is pure gold!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The strange sounds of Satan by Pat Nickell</title>
		<link>http://nickellbag.com/2012/01/18/2038/comment-page-1/#comment-13142</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Nickell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 03:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nickellbag.com/?p=2038#comment-13142</guid>
		<description>Must have been a slow day, Joe, for you to post this kind of trash.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Must have been a slow day, Joe, for you to post this kind of trash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on I might consider sax with Verdi by &#171; Nickell&#8217;s Bag</title>
		<link>http://nickellbag.com/2012/01/14/i-might-consider-sax-with-verdi/comment-page-1/#comment-13140</link>
		<dc:creator>&#171; Nickell&#8217;s Bag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 21:29:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nickellbag.com/?p=2020#comment-13140</guid>
		<description>[...] I might consider sax with Verdi [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I might consider sax with Verdi [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The pleasures of paint-by-numbers by celia rabinowitz</title>
		<link>http://nickellbag.com/2009/02/19/the-pleasures-of-paint-by-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-13113</link>
		<dc:creator>celia rabinowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 08:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nickellbag.com/?p=266#comment-13113</guid>
		<description>Emmy!  Larry and I would love to get in touch with you.  I saw some images of your work shown at the ABBA Gallery back in 2008--9.  It was so different from the work you did when we knew you back in Davis, but still absolutely your work.  I thought it gloriously beautiful. I would love to know more of what you are doing now.  We always thought you did extraordinary work.  Celia Rabinowitz  822 Miller, Davis, Ca 95616.  530-756-6650</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Emmy!  Larry and I would love to get in touch with you.  I saw some images of your work shown at the ABBA Gallery back in 2008&#8211;9.  It was so different from the work you did when we knew you back in Davis, but still absolutely your work.  I thought it gloriously beautiful. I would love to know more of what you are doing now.  We always thought you did extraordinary work.  Celia Rabinowitz  822 Miller, Davis, Ca 95616.  530-756-6650</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Get down with the Clown: Insane Clown Posse coming to Missoula&#8217;s Wilma Theatre by arbo</title>
		<link>http://nickellbag.com/2011/08/31/get-down-with-the-clown-insane-clown-posse-coming-to-missoulas-wilma-theatre/comment-page-1/#comment-12853</link>
		<dc:creator>arbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 20:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nickellbag.com/?p=1981#comment-12853</guid>
		<description>FACE PAINT FOR EVERYONE!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FACE PAINT FOR EVERYONE!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

